Independent Researcher
I am an independent theoretical researcher developing Relational Field Theory (RFT) — a single-field framework unifying gravity, quantum mechanics, cosmology, thermodynamics, and information through one coherent relational substrate, Rc(t,x).
The Relational Kernel Equation (Ω = Ω[Rc])
The unified Rc PDE for gravity, quantum behavior, and field emergence
The Local Well Illusion and the collapse of time as a fundamental constant
Relational Gravity: Completing the Gravitational Arc
Relational Calculus, a new mathematics of coherence and emergence
14
Published articles
Few concepts in modern physics carry as much significance—or as much mystery—as the Planck scale. It is the regime where gravitational effects become comparable to quantum effects, suggesting that both General Relativity and Quantum Field Theory should contribute to our description of nature.
Wave–Particle Duality as Regime Dependence A Structural Perspective from Relational Field Theory
What allows anything stable to exist at all? Before objects, laws, or equations can be described, something more basic must occur: something must persist long enough to be identified. This shifts the focus from what exists to the conditions under which anything can exist stably.
Relational Field Theory (RFT) has matured into a predictive framework with operational definitions, numerical demonstrations, and practical inference tools.
Physical quantities and laws emerge from the geometry, coherence, and flow of relational fields. A central idea is relational closure: high-coherence domains form effectively closed regions where stable invariants can persist.
A low-energy dynamical approach could give companion AI the gift of long-term relational memory - especially valuable for eldercare.
The event horizon of a black hole imposes a fundamental constraint: once matter and information cross it, ordinary recovery of structure through dissipation and re-equilibration becomes dynamically unavailable to external observers.
Relational Dominance: A Testable Structural Hypothesis for Navier–Stokes Turbulence
We begin with things - particles, fields, forces - and then build laws and equations to explain how those things behave. This approach has been extraordinarily successful. It is how we arrived at quantum mechanics, general relativity, and the Standard Model.
This article makes those steps explicit. I describe a repeatable cognitive pipeline I call Stained-Glass Thinking, which I have used consistently throughout the development of Relational Field Theory (RFT).
Using a simple childhood observation as the starting point, we show how shifting from origin-based to boundary-based thinking resolves infinite regress and opens a clearer way to engage with fundamental concepts in physics, time, and existence
In many areas of physics, the word “singularity” implies the breakdown of equations — an undefined point where the mathematics “fails” or where physical laws suddenly stop working. But this interpretation has always felt philosophically unsatisfying. Why should nature permit a point where its own rules dissolve?
Modern physics often assumes that the complexity we observe in the universe reflects an underlying complexity in its fundamental structure. Fields, particles, forces, and geometries are typically introduced as independent components, each carrying its own degrees of freedom.
Many physical and computational systems exhibit a familiar behavior: ordered states gradually decay in the presence of noise. Examples appear across science:
